If it was put up due to people being violent or repressing then first amendment I’d like to thing they would’ve been smart and mentioned that part , but no . Just hey it’s free to have your rights here ! What about anywhere else ? Are we not allowed it if we step off of Mount Rushmore ? (Kidding , but really it’s absurd !!) this is a great make you think read
There is another nuance too... "Subject to National Park Service regulations". Since when is the National Park Service entitled to decide what rights we have and don't have?
If it was put up due to people being violent or repressing then first amendment I’d like to thing they would’ve been smart and mentioned that part , but no . Just hey it’s free to have your rights here ! What about anywhere else ? Are we not allowed it if we step off of Mount Rushmore ? (Kidding , but really it’s absurd !!) this is a great make you think read
There is another nuance too... "Subject to National Park Service regulations". Since when is the National Park Service entitled to decide what rights we have and don't have?
Wait our rights depend on the national park people ! What if they are in a bad mood , now our rights are kaput ? Stupid .
{laugh} What is worse is that some people support this kind of tyranny!