As an ex-liberal, I was being pretty judgy. For her Silicon Valley ties primarily, but also that her website was scrubbed from listing the biography of a charity co-lead with ties to Open Philanthropy which funded event 201.
And I don’t know if that’s necessarily nefarios or fair to conclude guilt by association. She is young (insurance against Bobby assassination, perhaps), a little inexperience (nothing a little PR coaching can’t fix) and awfully easy looking on the eyes (which might not take away Trump votes, but it sure won’t hurt on taking away Biden votes.) It was a smart choice for Kennedy, no matter how you slice it. And I sure like the way they talk, I just have a nagging suspicion that he is being anointed. And if that’s the case, you know rule number one: no one gets to sit on the table unless he is compromised. Maybe he is playing some long game white hat con, but that would be pretty unbelievable.
Ah, it's an interesting game we guess at. When the government breaks your trust as completely as they have, particularly in the past four years, it's easy to jump at shadows.
I'd love to see RFK win for a number of reasons. Not the least of which being, I'd love to see *anyone* other than a Democrat or Republican win. If that happens, it's hard to believe that someone was behind the curtains pulling the strings.
And if someone is behind the curtains pulling the strings, could we still see some significant steps toward getting our nation going in the right direction?
Then we step to the concept of can we imagine that there isn't someone behind the curtains with at least some strong influence? If not completely pulling the strings, perhaps "guiding the ship" (hopefully not toward another disaster!)?
I believe we live in a complex world of inter related powers. Nations (governments), the wealthy (individuals), corporations, collaborations (industries) and spooks. Can any of them be completely independent of the others?
Of course the "cheating" is already going on as "war" is waged with censorship and propaganda.
Side note: I'm not sure if most people comprehend the influence a major international corporation has. Freed of borders, they influence life across the world.
Im not only talking about international corporations, although they do play a role. There are also clandestine operations and think tanks and individuals with great influence and power that impact our daily lives in ways that might not be so obvious that are not nationals.
Yes! There are organizations that seek to influence the world without regard to borders. Some of them, like the CFR, are probably not very well known at all.
As an ex-liberal, I was being pretty judgy. For her Silicon Valley ties primarily, but also that her website was scrubbed from listing the biography of a charity co-lead with ties to Open Philanthropy which funded event 201.
And I don’t know if that’s necessarily nefarios or fair to conclude guilt by association. She is young (insurance against Bobby assassination, perhaps), a little inexperience (nothing a little PR coaching can’t fix) and awfully easy looking on the eyes (which might not take away Trump votes, but it sure won’t hurt on taking away Biden votes.) It was a smart choice for Kennedy, no matter how you slice it. And I sure like the way they talk, I just have a nagging suspicion that he is being anointed. And if that’s the case, you know rule number one: no one gets to sit on the table unless he is compromised. Maybe he is playing some long game white hat con, but that would be pretty unbelievable.
Ah, it's an interesting game we guess at. When the government breaks your trust as completely as they have, particularly in the past four years, it's easy to jump at shadows.
I'd love to see RFK win for a number of reasons. Not the least of which being, I'd love to see *anyone* other than a Democrat or Republican win. If that happens, it's hard to believe that someone was behind the curtains pulling the strings.
And if someone is behind the curtains pulling the strings, could we still see some significant steps toward getting our nation going in the right direction?
Then we step to the concept of can we imagine that there isn't someone behind the curtains with at least some strong influence? If not completely pulling the strings, perhaps "guiding the ship" (hopefully not toward another disaster!)?
I believe we live in a complex world of inter related powers. Nations (governments), the wealthy (individuals), corporations, collaborations (industries) and spooks. Can any of them be completely independent of the others?
I’ll concede that it’ll be a lot harder to cheat if it’s a three way race with equal amount of potential.
Also, I want to add that the puppeteers could also very well be outside of the scopes you mentioned. “International” or “borderless.”
Either way, it’s gonna be an interesting Plato’s Cave this election season. :)
Plato's cave indeed!
Of course the "cheating" is already going on as "war" is waged with censorship and propaganda.
Side note: I'm not sure if most people comprehend the influence a major international corporation has. Freed of borders, they influence life across the world.
Im not only talking about international corporations, although they do play a role. There are also clandestine operations and think tanks and individuals with great influence and power that impact our daily lives in ways that might not be so obvious that are not nationals.
Yes! There are organizations that seek to influence the world without regard to borders. Some of them, like the CFR, are probably not very well known at all.